![]() |
||||||||
|
Repertoire > Sector > Serious Repertoire Back to Repertoire > Sector Back to Repertoire Home
YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!
SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS IN THE VAN
Imagine if you will a work for wind and brass by one of the world’s
great composers, which in three years is given some forty performances,
not by university and college groups, but by, among others, the Berlin
Philharmonic, City of Birmingham SO, Copenhagen Philharmonic, Adelaide
Symphony, Netherlands Radio, Latvian National Symphony, Radio France,
Tokyo Metropolitan, NDR Orchestra, London Sinfonietta, Cleveland
Orchestra and St Paul’s Chamber Orchestra.
When Magnus Lindberg’s Gran Duo was premiered in 2000 I contacted
a number of colleagues, arranged for some to be sent a score and tape,
and it might be expected that some, though possibly not many, in WASBE
and CBDNA would have played it. There have been two performances in
three years by professional wind bands, the US Marines under Tim Foley
and the Stockholm Wind Symphony, and four by College groups, New England
Conservatory, University of Kentucky, the Leeds University and the
Guildhall School of Music and Drama.
A recent professional performance drew the following comment in The
Guardian:
Lindberg’s Gran Duo, composed for the CBSO’s wind and brass sections in
2000, stages a multilayered musical conflict between the various
instrumental groups. The woodwinds’ pungent prickly music contrasts with
the brass’s softer heavier limbs, but both are quickly made part of a
drama that encompasses vast climaxes and weaves of tension. Oramo’s
performance created the sense of a mysterious slow-moving background
that was occasionally revealed between the cracks on the music’s
volatile surface.
HOW HARD IS GRAN DUO?
This is serious stuff, serious enough to be programmed at the Salzburg
Festival in 2003, but too serious and/or too difficult to engage our
attention. A recent residency at the University of Kentucky gave me the
chance to try out six scores which had been premiered or platformed at
WASBE in the past ten years. Samurai by Nigel Clarke,
Diaghilev Dances by Kenneth Hesketh, Danse Funambulesque by
Jules Strens, L’Homme Armé by Christopher Marshall,
Reflections on a 16th Century tune by Richard Rodney Bennett and
Christian Lindberg’s Concerto for Wind Orchestra. We were short
of rehearsal time for my final concert, so I gave them the option of
playing an easier programme; they voted 100% against that, though when
we tried bits of Lindberg, there were a few waverers, but on a
democratic vote, they decided to try it.
It is scored for 3343:4331, with very independent parts for each player,
demanding a great deal of concentration and virtuosity. Thanks to the
training of my predecessor, Richard Clary, Kentucky was up for the
challenge, and we gave a performance not without flaws and I would like
to think that other wind ensembles will now try it out. The sound world
is that of Stravinsky’s Symphonies of Wind Instruments, with
similar shifting metrical organisation, 2:1, 3:2, but here with two
differing speeds. I confess that I have always found the Stravinsky a
hard nut to crack, and I much prefer the musical challenges of the
Lindberg.
SOWETAN SPRING
TWO PERFORMANCES A YEAR ON AVERAGE
Gran Duo
is published by Boosey and Hawkes, publishers of a number of other major
works so far largely ignored by the wind band world. In 1990, the late
John Paynter conducted the winds of the Royal Scottish National
Orchestra in the premiere of Sowetan Spring, by James Macmillan.
In thirteen years, the work has received only 25 performances, one more
by the RSNO together with a professional recording, one each in Norway,
France, and Ireland, nineteen by British student groups, one in the
United States by the Juilliard School Wind Ensemble under Mark Gould and
recently one by Jerry Junkin in Austin.
Perhaps even more neglected is Entrance; Carousing; Embarcation
by Robin Holloway which in its unedited state Jerry bravely workshopped
at the WASBE 1991 Conference; I premiered it for BBC radio in 1992, and
have conducted five performances since, but of the consortium which
commissioned it, in 11 years, only James Croft and Frank Battisti have
conducted it, and it has received two student performances in UK, 11
performances in all. It is hard, it is long and rambling, a Maherlian
piece of considerable substance, but again it is not impossible, and
with its Viking programme it is a powerful addition to the repertoire.
Another neglected seascape on a similarly vast scale is Michael
Tippett’s Triumph (Schotts).
INSTANT MUSIC
I never cease to be amazed that in these days of fast foods and instant
entertainment more conductors have not persuaded their flute professors
to try Kust Schwertzig’s Instant Music which some may remember
from a fine performance by the Central Band of the RAF at WASBE in 1981
with Kenneth Bell as soloist. It is a charming full scale concerto,
scored with a light touch and jazzy overtones by a composer who walked
out of Stockhausen’s composition class at Damstadt and went back to
Vienna to write tunes. He and H K Gruber are in the avant garde
of that movement towards neo-romantic/neo-classic neo anything that
sounds fun and is agreeable, and this concerto is an excellent example.
BOOSEY & HAWKES COMMITMENT
Boosey and Hawkes have shown their commitment to the wind band by their
new WinDedpendence series, selected works at all levels under the
editorship of Craig Kirchhoff. One of their newest premieres was at
WASBE in 2003, David del Tredici’s In Wartime, a powerfully
evocative work written in the shadow of the Gulf War.
David Del Tredici is one of America’s leading composers, a Pullitzer
prizewinner, known internationally for his series of orchestral works
created around stories from Alice in Wonderland but there is nothing
remotely jokey about this music. The composer writes:
IN WARTIME
In Wartime,
my first (his first…let’s commission another) piece for wind
symphony, was begun on November 16, 2002, and completed on March 16th
(my birthday), 2003 – as momentous a four month period in history as I
have experienced. In Wartime consists of two connected movements –
Hymn and Battle March. The first has the character of a
chorale prelude, with fragments of Abide with Me embedded beneath
a welter of contrasting and contrapuntal musical material.
Heralded by a long, ominous roll on the snare drum and a steady,
measured beat, Battlemarch announces the start of war….Like the
incoming tide, the “waves” encroach inexorably on new harmonic ground;
like a gathering storm, the waveforms grow in enormity and frenzy, until
their fateful confrontation with Salmati, shah! (the national
song of Persia), laced as well with quotes from the opening of Wagner’s
Tristan und Isolde. With East battling West in musical terms,
this trio section of the march builds to the movement’s climax. As the
over whelming wash of sound subsides, the opening march returns, now
battle-weary but growing nevertheless to a full-throttled recapitulation
and finale – marked inevitably by a wail of pain.
Some colleagues find the material repetitive and trite; I found the work
to be utterly compulsive – del Tredici’s demonstrates masterly handling
of so many disparate styles in music, including what seems to be
somewhat trite opening material in the “chorale prelude”, the rather
sentimental hymn tune of the first section, and an almost “pop” tune to
start the second. As in a masterwork of the 18th or 19th century, what
might be unpromising motifs in less experienced hands, are transformed
here into a symphonic structure of the greatest tension. After the big
confrontation the passage in which the popular tune is accompanied by
wisps of scales, sinking into a familiar Tristan und Isolde
quotation, the music slips back to the popular tune, eventually subsumed
in a final coup de theâtre which leaves the audience stunned.
CAN WE BE SERIOUS FOR A MOMENT?
Are we going to play it, can we envisage forty or fifty performances in
the coming three years, will we revisit the MacMillan, Holloway,
Schwertzig and Tippett, is it worth “serious” composers writing for us?
The jury is out, the umpire is licking his wounds, we need more John
McEnroes in our wind movement!
|
|||||||