![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Repertoire > National > Germany Back to Repertoire > National Back to Repertoire Home
The modern “concert band” repertoire originated with a handful of works
by Holst and Vaughan Williams, (recorded by the RNCM Wind Orchestra on
Chandos 9697) and continued in the tonal experiments of Percy Grainger (Chandos
9549 & 9630). This initiative was echoed in Germany under the leadership
of Paul Hindemith, who in 1926, as Artistic Director of the
Donaueschingen Festival,
commissioned a series of works for wind band and contributed the
Konzertmusik op 41 himself.
His attempt to enthuse German military band musicians about new music
was not a success; the musical elite disliked this “open-air music”, the
bandsmen and their conductors disliked what they thought to be elitism,
so he must have been delighted when, twenty five years later, an émigré
in the US, he was asked by the US Army Band for a march. He became so
engrossed in the medium that he produced this twenty minute Symphony
in Bb, one of the masterworks for the wind band.
SYMPHONY
IN Bb
The first movement, in sonata form, opens with a wide ranging opening
theme for cornets and trumpets which dominates the movement. Various
canonic devices are used with good humour, until a sinister second idea
evolves, in unison at first, later as an accompaniment to massive brass
chords. The second movement is in ternary form; a grim march is a
background to long duet lines for cornet and alto saxophone. This gives
way to a fleet virtuosic scherzando, which in turn becomes the
accompaniment for the duet theme. The finale is a large-scale fugue,
culminating in a triumphant return of the opening theme of the first
movement.
DONAUESCHINGEN FESTIVAL
In the twenties, Hindemith had joined the artistic committee, of the
Donaueschingen Festival,
later becoming artistic director, and under his leadership the Festival
tried to encourage different types of ensembles, concentrating first on
quartet, later on vocal music and music theatre, and experimenting in
music for mechanical instruments and in Gebrauchsmusik, a term which
Hindemith came to hate, preferring Musik fur Sing-und Spielkreise.
Basically this is music to be written for use by amateurs or
professionals, the musical equivalent of the Bauhaus designs, simple and
functional.
Hindemith’s own conviction was that the ever-widening gap between
composer and general public could be bridged if composers wrote with a
particular purpose, encouraging the growth of amateur music. This creed
led to his commissioning in 1926 works for military band from his
colleagues Pepping, Krenek and Toch... The band was that of the training
battalion 14th Infantry Regiment stationed in the town, and the
conductor was Hermann Scherchen, to whom the works by Hindemith and Toch
were dedicated.
Spiel,
or Game, for Wind Orchestra, is scored for a small ensemble of
orchestral wind and brass, with optional parts for tenor horn, baritone
and two flugel horns. It can thus be played by orchestral wind or by the
regular German military band of the period. The miniature Overture
is in three parts, an energetic section with simple mixed metres, a
flowing trio set against semiquaver runs in wind, with a da capo. The
Idyll is also in ternary form, with something of the bitter-sweet
nostalgia of the decade, an extensive lyrical oboe melody is heard
twice, embracing a brief but poignant Mahlerian episode. The Buffo
finale is the most discursive movement; despite paying lip service to a
rudimentary sonata form, here we are in the realm of circus music, sheer
high spirited fun aimed at interesting those serious-minded German
military bands of the twenties in contemporary music.
MUSIC UNDER THE NAZIS
In England, after a brief flirtation with the world of the professional
composer, the military returned to their ceremonial duties, while in
Germany the wind band became a vehicle for the insidious politicking of
the Third Reich, and anything experimental was banned. On 2nd November,
1935, a Black List was issued proscribing performances on radio or in
theatres of over one hundred musicians, including composers such as
Antheil, Berg, Bloch, Gal, Krenek, Lopatnikow, Satie, Schulhoff, Weill,
and performers such as Godowsky, Horenstein, Klemperer, Schnabel.
The writing had already been on the wall; Schoenberg left for the States
in 1933, Toch moved to London in the same year, thence to America in
1934, while Hindemith continued with his career until 1937 when he moved
first to Switzerland, later to America. During the forties,
Blacher and
Hartmann
both withdrew from public life but not from their implacable opposition
to their political masters.
THEME AND VARIATIONS,
OP. 43A (1943)
The Theme and Variations was commissioned by Schoenberg’s
publisher, G. Schirmer. Never a composer to underestimate himself, he
wrote enthusiastically:
It is not one of my main works, as everybody can see, because it is not
a twelve-note composition. It is one of those compositions which one
writes in order to enjoy one’s own skill and to give a certain group of
music lovers - in this case bands - something better to play. I can,
however, assure that technically it is a masterwork. I believe it is
also original and know it is also inspired. Not only can I not write 10
minutes without inspiration but I wrote this with really great pleasure.
Although scored with large forces in mind, Schoenberg treats the players
as soloists with plenty of interest and challenge in each line, the
ideal way of dealing with the problems of wind band scoring. The
march-like Theme begins with a nine bar statement, moving
seamlessly through G minor and A to Bb, the dominant of Eb.; a two bar
rhythmic phrase in F# interrupts, repeated in F, before an energetic
eight bar phrase completes the tripartite structure. This twenty-one bar
theme is subjected to a set of seven very strict variations and a
Finale.
Variation 1
continues the mood of the theme with a little more energy. Variation
2 is a fleet scherzo, 42 bars long instead of 21, and this is
followed by a lyrical poco adagio with a duet for solo clarinet
and baritone horn. A Waltz follows as Variation 4, in G
major, before a more extensive duet for the clarinet and baritone, this
time in Eb major, that flattened submediant so beloved of Schubert.
Variation 6 is an energetic fugato, building to a climax
which disappears into the sinuous lines of variation 7. The
Finale refers to many of the melodic phrases from earlier variations
including the fugato, before a final triumphant peroration.
DIVERTIMENTO
OP.7
Boris Blacher was born in China of German/Baltic parents, and studied in
Berlin where he worked as a composer and arranger until becoming
director of the composition class in Dresden in 1938. Forced to leave
this post because of his opposition to Nazi policies, after the war he
returned to Berlin and later became director of the Staatliche
akademische Hochschule.
The Divertimento Op 7 was premiered in Berlin on 24 February 1937
the conductor was Felix Husadel, a colleague of Blacher at the
Hochschule. The Band was probably from the Luftwaffenmusikkorps, since
Husadel was Musik Inspector for the German Air Force at that time and
this was one of very few groups to employ saxophones, generally regarded
by the Third Reich as symbols of Western decadence.
The Intrada is a simple Rondo, looking back to the
Towermusic of an earlier period; a canonic theme is stated on a solo
trumpet, imitated by the rest of the orchestra, with a short contrasting
phrase marked espressivo. The March is in a typical ternary form,
a swaggering jaunty theme with a more lyrical trio section.
SYMPHONY NO 5
Top
I sit and look out upon all the sorrows of the world, and upon all
oppression and shame, I see the workings of battle, pestilence, tyranny,
I see martyrs and prisoners, I observe the slights and degradations cast
by arrogant persons upon the poor; All the meanness and agony without
end I sitting look out upon, See and hear.
In 1935, Hartmann’s magnificent setting of these words in his First
Symphony shows clearly the dilemma of the artist in Germany of the
Thirties. He was to remain a vocal opponent of Nazism and any other
totalitarian regime throughout his life. In his Sinfonia Tragica
of 1940-43, he underlines his beliefs, by quoting from some of his
banned colleagues, Berg, Hindemith, Webern, Bartok, and from Stravinsky
he uses that unearthly opening primitive cry from Le Sacre du
Printemps, an echo also of the second movement of this Fifth
Symphony.
His Symphony no 5, Symphony concertante for orchestra, first saw
light as a Concertino for
Trumpet and Wind in the early thirties. In 1949, it was revised as
Concerto for Wind Ensemble, Double Basses and 2 Solo Trumpets, and a
further revision added cellos and subsumed the solo parts into the
orchestral texture.
The first movement, Toccata, can be described as neo-baroque, a
fast 3/8 with strong motor rhythms pervading the textures. The two solo
trumpets are prominent within the texture, even in the rather ghostly
night-time twitterings of the etwas ruhiger which prefaces a
final brilliant coda.
This ternary form is used in the second movement, Melodie, which
is a lengthy exploration of the rhythm and melodic outline of the
opening bassoon cry of Stravinsky’s Le Sacre, framing a Scherzo,
muted pianissimo scramblings in trumpets, trombones and tuba. The
intense sadness of that unearthly cry from Le Sacre pervades the
material, on clarinet, later on bassoon, and this material frames an
energetic scherzo. The Rondo returns to the motivic patterning of the
first movement, neo-Baroque but with warmth and lyricism that often
evades other composers who used this technique. There is no contrasting
central section here, but a surprising cadenza, in which each solo
woodwind duets with the first trumpet before a ten bar highly charged
coda.
LOST CONCERTINO SURFACES
Concertino
for Trumpet and Seven Solo Instruments (Schotts)
Karl Amadeus HARTMANN (1905-1963)
Hartman's Concertino was composed around 1933 and premiered by
Professor Nikolay on August 12th 1933 during a Musical Congress in
Straatsburg (Strasbourg, France), conducted by Dr. Hermann Scherchen.
After the performance Hartmann took the score with him and tried to find
other brass players who would be interested in his composition, but he
could not find anyone with the technical skills demanded by the piece.
After years of searching, Hartmann visited Amsterdam in 1956 and gave
the score, written with a lead pencil, to the first trumpeter, Marinus
Komst, of the Concertgebouw Orchestra. Unfortunately Komst did not
perform as a soloist in those years; perhaps this was his reason for not
having returned the score. After some time Hartmann forgot whom he left
the music with.
After retiring from the Orchestra, Komst gave the Hartmann score to one
of his former students who also chose not to perform the piece. This
trumpeter also studied with Freddy Grin at one point. It was Grin who
eventually convinced his former student to return the score to Frau
Professor Elisabeth Hartmann, who was almost 90 years old then. She was
extremely thankful to finally be able to see the music that has been
mentioned so often by her late husband, who truly lamented having lost
the Concertino then.
DONAUESCHINGEN
IN 20th CENTURY
The town of Donaueschingen was a musical centre throughout the 18th and
19th centuries; composers such as Kalliwoda and Fiala worked there, and
an enormous library of Harmonie was built up, including what in all
probability is Mozart's original arrangement of Die Entfuhrung aus dem
Serail for Wind Octet, recently discovered.
In this century, Prince Max Egon zu Furstenberg founded the
International Festival of Contemporary Music from 1921, still thriving
today, although now in competition with younger trendier avant garde
centres such as Darmstadt. Hans Werner Henze writes in his recent
autobiography of the premiere of his ballet Ondine:
With this score I had reached a position that could hardly be further
removed from that of the so-called Darmstadt School, so it is scarcely
surprising that at its first performance at Donaueschingen on 20th
October 1957, under Hans Rosbaud's outstanding direction, three
representatives of the other wing - Boulez, my friend Gigi Nono and
Stockhausen - leapt to their feet after only the first few bars and
pointedly left the hall, eschewing the beauties of my latest endeavours.
GOLDMAN ON SCHOENBERG, HINDEMITH & STRAVINSKY
It is interesting now with hindsight to read music criticism from the
fifties of the works of Hindemith and Schoenberg. Richard Franko Goldman
wrote in Musical Quarterly in 1958 a review of the Fennell Mercury 1957
MG50143 recording of the Hindemith,
Schoenberg and Stravinsky
masterpieces, and uttered what today must seem heresy:
All band people are grateful to Schoenberg and Hindemith ….it is in a
sense ungracious…to wish that they had written better ones…the
Hindemith, indeed, sounds very much like a poorly done transcription……no
amount of special pleading will ever make the Theme and Variations
very interesting.
Goldman ends his article full of enthusiasm for the Stravinsky
Symphonies of Wind:
In contrast to the other two, warm and life-lit, a pleasure to hear,
with beautiful ideas and beautiful sounds.
You can find more information about German wind music between the Great
Wars from
John Charles Carmichael
whose thesis on The Wind Band Music of Hindemith, Krenek, Pepping,
Toch and Others from the 1926 Donaueschingen Music Festival: An Analysis
of Historical and Artistic Significance remains a standard reference
work.
|
|||||||||||||||||