![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Repertoire > Conferences & CDs > CBDNA 2005 Back to Repertoire > Conferences & CDs Back to Repertoire Home
CONFERENCE REVIEW: CBDNA 2005
I came away looking forward to conducting again the recent works by
Magnus Lindberg, Christopher Marshall and David Del Tredici, relishing
the Concertino of Karel Husa, and excited about several other
pieces, including the massive Corigliano, which needs a huge auditorium
and an expert ensemble. Other new works I would like to investigate and
probably programme if I had my own ensemble are:
THE GATES
New York is certainly the ultimate place for a series of concerts,
though not perhaps a conference. It is a long time since I experienced
the quirky good humour of the New Yorkers, the myriad of fine eating
places, the excitement of the artistic life, the splendour of the
architecture, the beauty of Central Park, adorned perhaps especially for
us by The Gates by Christo, hundreds of enormous flaps of orange
material running over all of the walks. I am not sure whether it is art,
but at a cost of 18 million dollars it gave us something to talk about
and looked very pretty against the snow. The great thing about New York,
Chicago and San Francisco is that they are cities for people to live in,
and the tourist or visitor gets caught up in the exuberance of that city
life.
THE MET, PHIL, FRICK & GUGGENHEIM
I was able to enjoy many of the major venues, starting at the
Metropolitan Opera with a strong Madama Butterfly, directed by an
histrionic conductor whose gestures might be better suited to a 400
strong marching band, but who was apparently ignored by the experienced,
silky-toned, marvelously balanced and perfectly groomed Metropolitan
Opera Orchestra.
On the second evening, many of us went to hear Lorin Maazel with the New
York Philharmonic. Dukas’ L’Apprenti Sorcier opened the concert
and while the orchestra is wonderful, details disappointed. Perhaps the
maestro’s cavalier curtailment of a public morning rehearsal led to some
sloppy playing; articulation of little notes was weak, balance certainly
favoured the brass, and Mickey Mouse never distorted the music the way
that Maazel does, with huge and totally un-necessary changes of tempi.
He has an extraordinary virtuoso technique and control which he shows
off, in my opinion, through the most unmusical rubato.
The new oboe concerto by Australian Ross Edwards was outstanding, not
least for the playing, dancing and mime of soloist and dedicatee, Diana
Doherty; it is still great to hear the NYP at Lincoln Centre, but a
recent press discussion of the greatest orchestras in the world should
on this showing have left the Phil out of the count and put in the Met.
VERY ENJOYABLE – BUT IS IT ART?
Visits to the Frick Collection and the Guggenheim were, as always,
immensely enjoyable, but although the conference was fascinating, with
some great playing on a par with the Met and the Phil, only rarely did
concerts provide a satisfactory artistic experience.
Warren Benson once wrote memorably in a WASBE Journal:
… I wish I could hear more wind conductors and instrumental teachers
using better and larger vocabularies that relate to beauty, aesthetics,
to charm, to gentleness, strength and power without rancour or anger, to
useful tonal vibrancy, live sound, to grace of movement, to stillness,
to fervour, to the depth of great age the exultation of great happiness,
the feel of millennia, the sweetness and purity of lullabies, the
precision of fine watches, the reach into time-space of great love and
respect, the care of phrasing, the delicacy of balance, the ease of
warmth, the resonance of history, the susurrus of wind in the pines and
whisperings in churches, the intimacy of the solo instrument, the kind
weight of togetherness and the rising spirit of creating something,
bringing something to life from cold print, living music, moving music.
POOR ACOUSTICS
This was an article of sheer poetry, a commodity lacking in most of the
concerts. Sometimes this was due to atrocious acoustics, fairly dead for
Texas A & M and Rutgers, completely dead for Louisville and Ithaca. It
was difficult for all four groups to make a beautiful sound, and yet
their concerts for me included some of the more interesting music.
TEXAS A& M
Two works in the fine opening concert, conducted by Bradley Kent, caught
my attention. The Bodine Marimba Concerto left me frustrated at
not hearing the whole work, and the arrangement of Zappa’s G-Spot
Tornado is a great virtuoso showpiece.
There were two memorable works from the WASBE 2003 Conference, five
movements from Patrick Dunnigan’s brilliantly outrageous reconstruction
of The Danserye by Susato, here lacking the finesse of phrasing
that Pat and FSU brought to Sweden, and In Wartime by David Del
Tredici. I enjoy this more each time I hear it. OK, so it is repetitive,
war on the ground is surely grindingly that, Beethoven 5 is too. The
little fantasia theme which he weaves around Abide with Me and
the trumpet ballad of the second half are on the face of it banal, but
the opening gestures of so many symphonies of Haydn and Mozart are
typical classical clichés – what is fascinating to me is how skillfully
he, and they, treat apparently mundane material.
There is an architecture and tension built here which I find totally
convincing, and which is lacking in dozens of other wind band works
based on hymn tunes or pop ballads. Here, for me is a master composer
treating our medium with dignity. The little Chorale Prelude on Abide
with Me, and the popular idiom of the tune of the second movement
make it easy listening, but Del Tredici is a master at making such
obvious material turn into what I for one find a moving and evocative
experience.
RUTGERS WIND ENSEMBLE
William Berz and his group are very experienced in contemporary scores,
but they could not sell me Wuorinen’s Windfall which I found to
be aggressive and inconsequential, for me little more than a random
series of motifs hurled at us, but I was intrigued by two new works.
Jonathan Newman’s The Rivers of Bowery moved with a sure feel for
tension and contrast and left me wanting another movement, while Yotam
Haber, the winner of the ASCAP/CBDNA Frederick Fennell Prized also left
me wanting to see a score of Espresso and hear more music by this
composer. The opening was an imaginative babble of orchestral colour a
little reminiscent of Petrouchka, and was followed by a sequence
of great ideas, not always connecting convincingly but invariably
interesting.
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE
The University of Louisville under the musical direction of Frederick
Speck put together a fascinating programme, starting with Lutoslawski’s
brilliant Fanfare for Louisville which preceded three substantial
pieces by Turrin, Grantham and Christopher Marshall. Marshall’s
L’Homme Armé was the third work of this Conference which we had
heard at WASBE Sweden; based loosely on the Dvorak Symphonic
Variations, it impresses me more and more with its mix of mediaeval
and modern idioms. I have never heard the infamous join into J2 for the
final variation so cleanly handled as in this performance. Turrin’s
trumpet concerto Chronicles was one of five well-crafted
concertos heard through the week, and the programme ended with an
idiomatic reading of the dependable Donald Grantham’s Fantasy
Variations.
NEW YORK, NEW YORK
The Ithaca College programme, conducted by Stephen Peterson, was very
clever, based on Music of New York Composers and Arrangers,
something old and something new. I confess not to know Morton Gould’s
Santa Fe Saga which I enjoyed more than a lot of Americana, and it
was wonderful to be reminded of Karel Husa’s Concertino for Piano and
Wind Ensemble, with its reminiscences of Bartok but very strong
personality. Redline Tango by John Mackey was the recent winner
of the Walter Beeler Award and will be heard in Singapore this summer;
good fun, brilliantly played, this is a tough piece which the best bands
will want to test their conductor on.
The disappointment here for me was in the CBDNA Commission, Voices of
the City by Richard Danielpour. I remember hearing a marvelously
lyrical sensuous piece which he wrote for Jaime Laredo and his cellist
wife. The next day I dived excitedly into the internet surf to track him
down, only to find that CBDNA had already commissioned a work for this
conference. In the event, only one movement was forthcoming, the first
of a pair, one fast and loud which we heard, the second…..? I am left in
suspense and hope to programme the whole work next year at Ithaca.
ETHNIC ROOTS
In general it was the shorter works which caught my attention, and many
of these sprang from a strong ethnic background. Grantham in his
Baron Ciementiere’s Mambo, Mackey in prizewinning Red Tango,
and Roberto Sierra with his Fandangos turned to Spanish and
Portuguese idioms of South America, generously larded with bitonality
and mixed metres.
FIVE CONCERTOS
There were several substantial concertos played at Conference, which
might add weight to any programme and serve to feature a fine soloist or
soloists. Eric Ewazen’s Shadowcatcher featured the American Brass
Quintet, and would be useful if you wanted a work with horn and two each
of trumpets and trombones as soloist. Joseph Turrin’s Chronicles
was written for Philip Smith, the New York Philharmonic and Kurt Masur,
played here with aplomb by Susan Rider of the US Marines. Mark Kellogg
and Eastman gave an assured account in the world premiere of the
Concerto for Trombone and Wind Ensemble by Jeff Tyzik and Michael
Daugherty showed a new lyricism in the world premiere of his Brooklyn
Bridge for Clarinet and Symphony Band, wonderfully played by Michael
Wayne. The outstanding concerto for me was the oldest; Karel Husa’s
Concertino for Piano and Wind Ensemble I found memorable, full of
personality, engaging my interest throughout another fine performance
from Ithaca College.
LINCOLN CENTRE ALICE TULLEY RECITAL HALL
It was a great pity that two of the least satisfying programmes took
place in this splendid acoustic. The programme of the Goldman Band was
traditional, Sousa, Offenbach, Tchaikovsky, Grainger, Rossini and
Goldman’s On the Mall, with the world premiere of Festival
March by Michael Valenti and one Goldman commission , Peter Mennin’s
Canzona of 1951, which I find to be rather academic
note-spinning. I kept wondering which composers Goldman might have
commissioned for new light pieces for this concert. As a guide to
community and professional bands on programming for the 21st century,
this programme was an unhelpful dinosaur, and despite persuasive
conducting from Chris Wijhelm and some fine solo contributions,
discrepancies in ensemble and intonation confirmed traditional fears
about military bands.
SMALL COLLEGE INTERCOLLEGIATE BAND
Brilliantly and persuasively conducted as it was by the enormously
experienced Larry Livingstone, I just could not understand the raison
d’être of this programme. Small colleges usually are unable to tackle
large-scale works, and here were over 70 students playing two
transcriptions and a premiere which focussed on the Beatles, the
arranger/composer Shelley Berg and his Trio and left many of them tacet
for huge periods – an expensive lesson in jazz improvisation, if you
have paid your way to New York from California or Florida.
The message was clear, there is little original music worth playing so
lets do transcriptions. It was interesting to receive recently the 2004
WASBE Journal with a chapter by Mark Reimer on repertoire for Honors
Bands. I especially relished the quotations from Frank Battisti:
Much music studied by school bands is of limited musical value. We
should raise the taste of the conductor,
and his quotation from Boulez:
I believe in music that is demanding, that goes into depth of the human
being, not music for entertainment.
All too rarely did this conference touch at all the problems of the
programmes of high schools or small colleges, all too often the message
of this conference, as outlined in the opening discussion, was that we
need to get bums on seats through entertainment; so beware contemporary
music.
This concert was followed somewhat ironically by a discussion on The
Future of Concert Music by a Roundtable of Music Critics. I left,
since I did not want to hear more advocacy for more dumbing down as the
panacea to all our problems but maybe they had all the answers. I hope
someone else reports.
CARNEGIE HALL & NEW ENGLAND
We were fortunate to hear several of the top groups in the world playing
in Carnegie Hall.
New England Conservatory opened this mini-series with four delicious
undirected movements from Cosi fan Tutte arranged by Wendt,
beautifully phrased with a freedom lacking in so many other
performances. I could not make much of Richard Toensing’s The Whitman
Tropes for soprano and ensemble, conducted authoritatively by
William Drury, but the work I really enjoyed was Magnus Lindberg’s
Gran Duo, a superbly balanced performance under Charles Peltz. Speed
relationships and scoring are similar to those of Stravinsky’s
Symphonies of Wind Instruments, and I actually find the Lindberg
more interesting and attractive as a work, a better piece for making
audience contact and a great challenge to all of the soloists in a wind
ensemble.
It is not an easy listen for the first time, and perhaps this, and other
works, would have benefited by an introductory rehearsal or discussion.
My advice is to purchase a recording; later this year there should be
three on the market, one from Ondine, one from the President’s Own and
one from University of Kentucky. Others will follow, I am certain, since
this, in my view, is a masterpiece of wind ensemble writing.
MICHIGAN SYMPHONY BAND
The University of Michigan Symphony Band (the only university “band”,
all of the others were “ensembles”, albeit often very big ones) under
the very expert Michael Haithcock gave an idiosyncratic performance of
that great classic, Lincolnshire Posy, fluently conducted and
brilliantly played, providing a number of talking points. The Band is
excellent, Haithcock has fine-tuned it so that balance and ensemble are
exemplary, and he like Maazel has complete control. His performance of
Grainger was straightforward in its observance of dynamics, with nothing
original in the way of phrasing, but by choosing virtuoso speeds, there
was not always enough time for clarity of texture to tell. It was good
for our preconceived notions of interpretation to be challenged, but
occasionally what seemed strange pull-ups and allargandos, (perhaps of
the school of Lorin Maazel) might have been considered perverse.
I especially loved the canons in Rufford Park Poachers, but not
the two big gaps which intruded. The Brisk Young Sailor was brisk
indeed, and I am not at all sure that his True Love would have
ever caught up with him before he dashed into Nagasaki and found
another, way before robins nested, certainly scarcely time for the
syncopations to make their mark, nor the canons to be played with any
personality. Details fascinated me. Sections marked freely were often
almost in strict tempo, the end of the Brisk Young Sailor I am
sure is marked in strict tempo, here we had a massive Maazellian
ralentando. Their other classic celebration was of Chester by
William Schuman a work which like the Mennin and Copland’s Emblems
just leaves me cold, even in this fine performance.
Their opening work was by Bright Sheng, who turned to his teenage life
in Tibet for the inspiration for LA’I (love Song for Orchestra
without Strings). Striking open gestures, wild free canonic writing
between horns and trombones, were interspersed by cries from wind,
perhaps a little reminiscent of the elemental wildness of pieces by
Varese. A more lyrical section followed, before a brief return to the
intensity of the opening; this was a piece that left me again wanting
more, perhaps a contrasting slow movement, very exciting, albeit too
short at just over 4 minutes.
For many, the highlight of the Conference was Susan Botti’s work,
Cosmosis for Wind Ensemble, Soprano and Women’s Voices which
inhabited a fascinating world, that of the spider, Arabella, who
was the subject of an experiment to see if she could, and I suppose,
would, weave a web in space. Based on poems by May Swenson, Susan Botti
taps an extraordinary variety of sounds and colours, from the wind and
from the choir. She herself was the soloist, and this is certainly an
imaginative work which deserves more performances.
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Saturday night’s Carnegie concerts began with University of Southern
California under principal conductor H Robert Reynolds, though the first
item was expertly conducted by Sharon Lavery, the third movement of
Frank Ticheli’s Symphony no 2, Apollo Unleashed. We heard the
first two movements in the 2003 WASBE Conference, and enjoyable though
this third movement is, I still wish he had ended with the moving second
movement, maybe a twenty first century Unfinished Symphony. This
finale seemed a little flippant by itself, and would perhaps make more
sense in context; the second movement showed a welcome “serious” side to
Ticheli.
It was good to hear some Schuller again, his Symphony for Brass and
Percussion, harsh and uncompromising, beautifully offset by six
movements of the Mozart Serenade in Bb. I would never have
thought that I would be upset by the omission of a movement, but it
meant that the sublime Adagio could not make its full effect,
partially because it did not follow the missing Minuet and Trios,
partially because the players here and throughout never were allowed the
full freedom of chamber musicians.
I cannot help remembering the flexible rubato of the Chamber Orchestra
of Europe at the Edinburgh Festival, un-directed, or Simon Rattle giving
the CBSO unbridled, almost perverse, license at a BASBWE Conference; (it
was far more controlled when they returned from a South America tour to
a BBC Prom). For me, this excellent performance was just a tad too
organized and controlled, though Bob Reynolds gave another valuable
object lesson in fine, unfussy conducting.
EWE
Later in the evening Eastman Wind Ensemble with Mark Scatterday always
in control, gave a curate’s egg of a programme beginning with a Bach
chorale Komm, süsser Tod, lovingly and movingly played in memory
of Frederick Fennell, and ending with an impressive performance of
Music for Prague 1968 of Husa, which still makes an incredible
impact. In between were the jokey Fandangos of Robert Sierra,
David Maslanka’s Tears which I still do not warm to, and the
Concerto for Trombone and Wind Ensemble of Jeff Tyzik, three works
which I need to get to know more before I can recommend them
wholeheartedly.
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN
And so to the finale, University of Texas at Austin and the long awaited
Symphony no 3 by John Corigliano, Circus Maximus. I first met
Jerry Junkin nearly quarter of a century ago in Ann Arbor, when he
crammed me into a tiny car with Karel Husa in front, off to a rehearsal
of the Michigan second group in Husa’s very demanding Trumpet
Concerto. His conducting, already formidable, has grown in scope and
development, his ensemble at Austin is undoubtedly one of the finest in
the world, and his programming becomes more and more interesting. This
was a well-planned programme; the theme of celebrating the past was
carried through, with great performances of Emblems and Jerry’s
own edition of Music for the Royal Fireworks, framing another nod
at South American dance types, a Mambo by Donald Grantham deftly
conducted by Robert Carnochan.
CIRCUS MAXIMUS
My train – yes, there are trains in USA and they are a gentle gracious
form of transport without the stress of air travel – was due to leave in
mid-concert, but I attended Jerry’s morning rehearsal, which convinced
me that I had to be there to experience the performance.
Corigliano with his experience in film, in opera and concert hall, was a
first-rate choice for a major wind work to end the New York conference,
and this work lived up to the hype surrounding it. He writes in a
programme note:
My first symphony was for large symphony orchestra, my second for string
orchestra alone, and this piece is for winds, brass and percussion
alone. For the past three decades I have started the compositional
process by building a shape, or architecture, before coming up with any
musical material. In this case, the shape was influenced by a desire to
write a piece in which the entire work is conceived spatially. But I
started simply wondering what dramatic premise would justify the
encirclement of the audience by musicians, so that they were in the
center of an arena. This started my imagination going, and quite
suddenly a title appeared in my mind: Circus Maximus.
The Latin words, understandable in English, convey an energy and power
by themselves. But the Circus Maximus of ancient Rome was a real place —
the largest arena in the world. 300,000 spectators were entertained by
chariot races, hunts, and battles. The Roman need for grander and wilder
amusement grew as its empire declined.
The parallels between the high decadence of Rome and our present time
are obvious. Entertainment dominates our reality, and ever-more-extreme
"reality" shows dominate our entertainment. Many of us have become as
bemused by the violence and humiliation that flood the 500-plus channels
of our television screens as the mobs of imperial Rome, who considered
the devouring of human beings by starving lions just another Sunday
show. The shape of my Circus Maximus was built both to embody and to
comment on this massive and glamorous barbarity. It utilizes a large
concert band, and lasts approximately 35 minutes. The work is in eight
sections that are played without pause.
Introitus:
Martial unison fanfares from the eleven trumpets surrounding the
audience break off into weird cries from the on-stage ensemble; also
placed around the hall, a saxophone quartet play reflectively, a tiny
horn ensemble and others echo the fanfares; as Corigliano writes:
Our need for constant change echoes the desires of the ancient mob, only
now we can access it all by pressing a button. Music in this section is
constantly interrupted by other music and comes from all sections of the
hall.
Like Mahler Seventh Symphony there are Night Music episodes, the
one evocative of the tranquility of the forest murmurs, the other
reflecting the hidden energy of the darkened city. This breaks into the
climax of the work, Circus Maximus. The peak of the work
incorporates all the other movements and is a carnival of sonoric
activity. A band marching down the aisles counterpoints the onstage
performers and the surrounding fanfares. Exuberant voices merge into
chaos and a frenzy of overstatement.
The final two sections are more reflective; Prayer is drawn from
a series of plagal cadences, and gives way to Coda: Veritas in
which the music of the Introitus gradually takes over before the
final denouement.
This was a splendid way to end Conference, and those unable to be
present will be able to purchase a commercial recording in due course,
though how they will encompass the dynamic range and the geography of
the “surround music” I cannot imagine. Meanwhile, Jerry Junkin enters
his time as President, and we can look forward to the 2007 conference
with confidence that CBDNA is at last looking outside the box and making
firm contact with composers, if not with critics and players from the
world of the music profession. Certainly, the level of performance of
these ensembles compares very favourably with the “profession”, even if
the music is still variable.
In short, the CBDNA 2005 Conference provided consistently great music
making, some fascinating major new repertoire, interesting papers and
discussions on which I have no space to comment, but proved ultimately
frustrating in its lack of contact with the real world of music, and
also lack of contact with the world of the High School conductor. In the
old days, the Universities provided role models for the best high school
ensembles, now the technical demands of the repertoire are considerable,
and the CBDNA’s charge to lead by example in this area is neglected.
Now the wind ensemble circus maximus moves on to Singapore, and in July
we shall see and hear what WASBE can do in this struggle to establish
the best repertoire and to take our place in the sun with orchestra,
chamber and vocal music. Perhaps it does not matter, but I still feel
that the wind ensemble repertoire created since Frederick Fennell’s
revolution over fifty years ago is one which cannot be ignored for ever.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||