![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Repertoire > Composers > Gordon Jacob Back to Repertoire > Composers Back to Repertoire Home
Q. Your music spans over 50 years; looking back from the perspective of
today, how would you say your style has developed?
It is always difficult to judge one's own music but I think I aim at
greater simplicity nowadays. There was a tendency after World War I to
be rather extravagant; we were all very keen on being up-to-date, but as
one becomes older that feeling diminishes and you simply write what
comes.
Q. You studied with Sir Charles Villiers Stanford, Herbert Howells and
Vaughan Williams at the RCM; how influential were they in developing
your style of composition?
I'm not sure they were influential in developing the style of my
compositions but they were influential teachers. I think I learnt more
from Herbert Howells than I did from either Stanford or Vaughan
Williams. Stanford thought all 20th-century music was terrible; he
didn't even like Richard Strauss, and as for Vaughan Williams and Holst,
he thought they were outrageous.
But Stanford was very good in giving one the basic technique of
composition. I did free composition with him, and harmony and
counterpoint with Herbert Howells. Later I changed to Vaughan Williams
whom I did not find particularly helpful as a teacher, although I was
influenced by his music and it was during the time I was a student that
he brought out the Pastoral Symphony (1922); he had already
written the Sea Symphony (1912) and the London Symphony (1914), so his
style was set by then.
Vaughan Williams was a great influence then; so was Stravinsky -
especially his Rite of Spring (1 913), and I was influenced by
Russian music in general; it was something quite new to me. I used to go
to the Diaghilev Ballet Russe; there were two seasons of it in
London at that time so I heard an enormous amount of Russian music and
that really had a marked influence on me during my student days, more so
than English music and it still does. Later I was caught up in the
Sibelius craze and that was really quite healthy.
Q. In that case to what extent would you say that your music is part of
the Holst and Vaughan Williams tradition?
One has to admit that they were both influential in my formative years.
Of course I knew them both well, but I particularly admired Holst; he
was very different from Vaughan Williams. Later I taught instrumentation
to Holst's daughter, Imogen, at the College. Incidentally, she was one
of my first pupils to learn to write for brass band, the others wouldn't
do it - they were frightened of all those treble clefs.
Q. Your style is economical, direct and never over-sentimental. Was it a
conscious decision to write in this way?
No, but I do hate sentimentality in music; it is so different from
genuine feeling.
Q. You are renowned as an orchestrator and your book 'Orchestral
Technique' (1931) is standard text for student composers and arrangers.
Do you ever feel that being regarded as an authority on orchestration
and arranging has in some way been detrimental to your reputation as a
composer?
It was at one time. If the critics are given a handle to use, as it
were, about any-body, it saves them a lot of trouble. If they can say
that the instrumentation was masterly, then they don't have to say much
about the music. I suppose it's a mechanical reaction. I used to be
rather irritated by that, but nowadays I really don't mind. I never read
press notices so I don't know what they're saying about me.
Q. The craftsmanship of your works is beyond question. Would you say
that this tradition of professionalism is being carried on by the
younger composers of today?
Not as much as it should be. They are inclined to follow the rather
pernicious doctrine that technique doesn't matter, it's originality and
novelty that matter. They think that if you write something which is
very awkward to play then that's fine because you ought not to make
concessions to technique. But I believe that craftsmanship, particularly
the understanding of instruments, is especially important.
I taught at the RCM up to about 12 years ago and some of my students
then were pretty advanced in their ideas. In fact one of them hardly
wrote any notes down on paper but gave detailed instructions about what
to play, so I gave up teaching after that.
Q. I've always been fascinated by some of the harmonic resources from
which you draw. Which composers have been influential in this respect?
The Russian Nationalists, particularly Stravinsky in his earlier works,
Sibelius and Elgar - whose work I've always admired. His instrumentation
is absolutely first-rate, but he was also a fine contrapuntist and his
invention in the development of his ideas was remarkable, especially
when you consider that he did not have any formal instruction.
Q. Quite apart from your own compositions, you have had a marked effect
on the compositions of others. As Professor of composition at the RCM
you taught many of the British composers of today; Malcolm Arnold,
Adrian Cruft, Elizabeth Maconchy and Bernard Stevens to name but a few.
How soon did you realise the potential of these composers?
I recognised that they were especially talented, though my idea of
teaching was not to try to influence them to write in a particular
idiom, but to encourage them to develop a style of their own. During the
Sibelius craze, some of my pupils copied him religiously. I used to say
to them, what you admire in Sibelius is his individuality; if you really
want to imitate him you have to try and develop your own personality,
and you can't do that by following what he does.
Q. Is there anything in your career that you would have changed?
I don't think so. I have had a happy life on the whole and people have
been encouraging and helpful to me. There have been no serious set-backs
in my musical development, and if I had my time over again I would be
happy to do the same.
Q. You have seen great changes within your lifetime in the sort of music
being written. How do you see the music of today in relation to, say,
that of the 20's?
It is related in the sense that the pursuit for novelty and dissonance
was going on then. Of course Schoenberg and Webern were around in the
'20's, and I remember one performance of some of Webern's music -
particularly sparse and with many silences - in which a well-known
German conductor proceeded to conduct a clarinettist playing pianissimo
and a harpist playing a harmonic, with great energy and enormous sweeps
of the baton. It was impossible to take it seriously.
Q. Which contemporary composers do you most admire?
One cannot help but admire Britten whom I suppose is still considered a
contemporary composer. Others include Prokofiev, Shostakovich and some
of the American composers, especially Copland. All of these, it seems to
me, are in the line of progress. I don't really admire the extremists.
Q. If you could select only one work by which you were to be judged,
which would you choose?
It changes from time to time so I doubt I could choose just one. My
favourites are the Clarinet Quintet which I wrote in the '30's;
the Oboe Quartet (1938); more recently the Mini Concerto for
Clarinet and Strings, which I wrote last year; and some of my pieces
for band like the Concerto for Band (1969) and Flag of Stars
(1956).
Q. Turning more specifically to your wind band and wind ensemble music,
perhaps your best known work in this medium is 'An Original
Suite'(1928). The title puzzles many people; why 'original'?
I never liked that title and I asked Boosey & Hawkes to change it
but they said that the Suite was now known by that name so I decided to
retain it. There is historic reason for the name. At that time very
little original music was being written for what was then 'military'
band, so the title was a way of distinguishing that it was an original
work rather than an arrangement - not that the music was very original
in itself. It was an unfortunate title, I know. When I went to America
some years ago, I heard many bands playing the work, and I told them
that I didn't like the title.
Q. You seem to have an affinity with wind instruments and a particular
penchant for the wind band. As an orchestrator, the 'all-colour' quality
of the band obviously appeals, but are there other reasons for your
interest in the medium?
One of the chief reasons is that you get your music performed if you
write for wind band, whereas writing for orchestra can be a purely
academic exercise unless you have a definite commission.
Q. English folk song suites have long been associated with the wind band
- one thinks of Vaughan Williams, Holst and Grainger. Your own works
'Old Wine in New Bottles' and 'Concerto for Band' are derivative of folk
material and, to a lesser extent, even your 'Original Suite' is folkish.
What would you say was the reason for composers transcribing folk song
material for band?
It was simply the Vaughan Williams' influence on English folk song
music. My Original Suite was written in 1923 whilst I was still a
student at the RCM. The slow movement is Irish rather than English 'folky',
the reason being that the Londonderry Air was extremely popular and much
admired during the '20's.
Q. Transcribing the Vaughan Williams' 'Folk Song Suite' from military
band to orchestral score was quite a responsibility for a 29-year old.
How did this transcription come about?
Boosey & Hawkes, who publishes the original, asked Vaughan Williams to
do his own transcription, but he couldn't be bothered, so he asked me,
and that's really what put me on the track of writing band music.
Q. I understand that you are still writing today. What sort of things
are you working on at present?
I'm writing an orchestral suite. I have recently completed a concerto
for flute and string orchestra which has yet to be performed and a
double concerto, receiving its first performance this year, for trumpet
and clarinet with wind band accompaniment.
Q. Have you any remaining or rather unfulfilled ambitions musically?
Not now. I just go on writing whatever people commission me to write. I
did the Second Flute Concerto and the Mini Concerto
without being asked but nearly everything else is commissioned. Most
composers give up when they are much younger than me. I ought not to be
writing at my age.
I know many that would disagree!
CATALOGUE OF WORKS FOR WIND BAND BY GORDON JACOB
First President of BASBWE
Official website:
Gordon Jacob
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||