![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Conducting
Back to: Conducting Home
PREPARATION
RECOMMENDED: Guide to Score Study for the Wind Band Conductor - Frank Battisti
& Robert Garafalo
ANALYSIS AND SCORE MARKING
Below is my personal method of tackling any score; some elements of it
might be useful to you. The system of phrase analysis is very much part
of the teaching in Vienna and St Petersburg, and I always like the
comment by, I think it was, the pianist Rudolf Serkin, who said that he
always liked to know how far a phrase was going to go when he entered
it. Some conductors do not mark a score at all – those are the ones with
a good memory or good eyesight, or both. I have neither. So I:
DYNAMICS
It is at that very highest level of performance that a wealth of
interpretative choices and decisions become available at least to the
really sensitive intelligent and imaginative recreator. It is in this
realm that there is not one pp, but many subtly different pps;
not one f but many different kinds of fs, and not one slur
but many different kinds of legatos etc. etc. The more basic point
however is that it is pp not a p or a mf.
GUNTHER SCHULLER
Diminuendo
signifies forte, crescendo signifies piano.
Von BULOW
For me an orchestra's lack of discipline is always reflected in a feeble
dynamic range.... Something I do very often.... is to push the dynamic
register to the absolute maximum until it reaches what I think are
appropriate levels for a given work.
PIERRE BOULEZ
ANTICIPATING THE PROBLEMS
I believe that you need to have a game plan, which you then switch
according to the players and their reactions. You must be reactive to
their playing, their musicality and technique, you must listen, and
balance leading and following.
In the wind orchestra we do not have to work hard at making a lot of
noise.
We must work hard to:
1 Control all dynamic levels
2 Anticipate dynamic events
In general:
crescendo
must start quietly
diminuendo
must start loudly
subito piano
is more effective if preceded by a crescendo
subito forte
is more effective if preceded by diminuendo
the first fortissimo is the smallest
the last is the biggest
In a tutti forte or fortissimo, make sure
that you keep the excitement to the end.
Build an architecture of dynamic levels in your phrasing and in your
whole concept of the piece.
BALANCE
Composers usually write one dynamic mark for the entire vertical scoring
involved. They expect performers to adjust their instruments' relative
strength according to the primary or secondary importance of their
roles.
There is one fundamental physical law that bears repetition, since so
many musicians are unaware of it; a sustained note is always stronger
than a moving voice....There is so much to be decided by the conductor
who cares for a balanced performance that no amount of detail can
possibly cover the permutations presented by such considerations as
types of instruments (and players), size and acoustic of hall, seating
arrangements, types of scoring....
ERICH LEINSDORF
Preparing scores for performances, the conductor will discover the
differences between a wind choir of 1810 and 1910 to be so great that
any resemblance is almost co-incidental....The dynamics of brass
instruments must be adjusted, especially on long-held notes
ERICH LEINSDORF on approximating the timbre of different periods
ARTICULATION
James Croft quotes the great Revelli as insisting on non-legato notes
“not quite touching”
Melodic articulation
- Very often we gloss over the little breaks in legato lines, making the
whole line sound legato. Very often there will be a counterpoint of
possible commas or Luft-pausen, or the accompaniment will be tenuto
while the melody is more broken up. I believe that clarity of
articulation can bring variety and life to our lines. Think how a singer
would articulate, or how a string player would bow.
Accompaniment articulation
- So often wind and string writing will be underpinned by slow moving
block chords in lower wind or brass. If they are slightly detached it
will keep the pulse alive.
Staccato
- differentiate between staccato crotchet, quaver and semiquaver (1/4,
1/8 or 1/16)
it will be longer in a dry acoustic, shorter in a generous acoustic
it might be longer in crescendo, shorter in diminuendo
it might grow longer in ritardando, shorter in accelerando
it might grow longer at the top of a scale leading into another event
might be longer in lyrical romantic music, shorter in jazz idiom or
neoclassic
Legato
- Too much wind music (and orchestra music) is played too smoothly
without due regard for the cut and thrust of the phrasing. Often detail
is lost, counterpoint is confused, and harmonic progressions are
blurred. The careful articulation of phrasing, and even exaggeration, is
essential to clean performance.
PHRASING
A phrase lives essentially through the distribution of energy
Pierre Boulez
Boulez is incapable of phrasing. It's as simple as that
Hans Keller
In my view, the only way to conduct is to conduct with a purpose. If I
hear something that has remarkable moments but no special design, it
leaves me unsatisfied.
Pierre Boulez
A melodic phrase needs to be articulated. If we're talking about
phrasing in general, lets talk about articulation, because articulation
does indeed relate to a particular phrase, but also to a rhythm, to a
form or a segment of form. It also related to the delineation of timbre
and the delineation of polyphony.
We do not need to conduct the beats - the players will normally
develop a corporate feel for the pulse.
We do not need to conduct the dynamics, except to control - the
players should respond to the printed page but we need then to indicate
balance.
We do need to conduct the phrasing and the overall architecture –
we have the responsibility of co-ordinating the phrasing, organising the
balance and constructing the architecture. No player can know exactly
what his or her part in the structure of the movement is at any one
time, only we, with the privilege of the score and our study, can
develop this.
Phrasing is our most important job.
PREPARATION FROM THE PODIUM
Indispensable partners of knowledge are imagination, thoughtful
intelligence, and ultimately the willingness to forget ourselves in the
service of what we undertake to represent - the composer and his music.
ERICH LEINSDORF
CHARLES MUNCH on score correction - One may examine the score and
correct physical errors
GUNTHER SCHULLER on analysis:
Analysis is to me the thorough study of the score, of its specific
notation in all its elements: melodic/thematic, harmonic,
rhythmic/metric, structural, textural, "orchestrational", formal, etc.
Analysis in that sense is an all-encompassing retracing of the steps of
composition, yielding the fullest possible understanding of what went
into the piece in the first instance and what therefore needs to be
"realised" in performing/re-creating it.
BOULEZ on contriving a good balance:
There are times when respect for the musical text alone does not serve
much purpose. You may have a secondary part written for a relatively
weighty instrument, and a principal part written for a much lighter
instrument. You have to change the dynamics. I have no qualm about doing
that. As a fellow composer, I say to myself, "That's what he wanted to
hear, but he didn't have enough experience to write down the exact
dynamics, " So I change them, that's all.
The composer has written a certain number of instrumental lines and on
the whole, he hasn't done so just to make a general amount of noise.
He's composed those lines so that we can hear certain things, so that we
can experience a certain hierarchy that's dependant on his writing. What
I try to do is to bring out that hierarchy in a very precise way, even
when it’s difficult.
GUNTHER SCHULLER on Conducting from Memory:
The vast majority of conductors when conducting from memory..........are
rarely or only intermittently aware of harmonic or tonal-function
aspects, structural features, interesting counter-melodies or motives,
timbral balance, intonation, unusual orchestral details.
GUSTAV MAHLER on Interpretation:
As a young conductor I too was in my performances of the great works
artificial and erratic and added too much of my own, albeit with
comprehension and spirit. Only much later did I arrive at the full
truth, simplicity and recognition that real artistry can only be found
through a total lack of artificiality?
However, I think that the youthful “artificial and erratic” performance
of works is a necessary phase that we all need to go through. Without
temperament we can show very little.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||