![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Conducting
Back to: Conducting Home
MASTER CLASS
Or
TAKING THE DECIBELS DOWN
We do have a problem with the wind band, that of decibels…..in
short we all tend to play too loudly. The reasons for this are
five-fold, in part due to the brilliance of the medium with all of those
primary colours jostling and competing, in part due to our choice of
repertoire, in part due to the noisiness of our modern age, in part due
to sheer laziness and in part due to poor conducting.
Gunther Schuller sums it all up, with reference to symphony orchestras,
in his magnificent book, The Compleat Conductor (Oxford
University Press).
The abuse, and misuse, of dynamics is perhaps the most common evil in
orchestral playing today, (especially in the United States <and at
BASBWE concerts …… I added that>) being either tolerated or generated by
our conductors. This is particularly ironic, since the technical
abilities of modern players are so high that no claim could ever be made
that subtle control is beyond their capabilities. And to excuse this
dynamic laziness by saying “its more fun to play loud” or it makes a
bigger effect” or “its more exciting” or more philosophically resigned –
“it’s just human nature”, is insufficient reason and just plain
laziness, carelessness.
He is talking about the great orchestras of the world; how much more
important is it for us working with less than excellent wind bands to
try to harness their dynamic exuberance?
At the 2003 WASBE Conference, Wayne Rapier, co-principal oboe for many
years of the Philadelphia and Boston Orchestras, said that as a young
player he used to sit in on rehearsals by Stokowsky to try to analyse
why the performances were so great. He reckoned that Stokowsky had an
incredible control of the architecture of dynamics, with two or three
major climatic moments in a concert. I personally remember playing for
Ferdinand Leitner in Brahms Symphonies, with our dynamic range extended
incredibly – so that a fortissimo at the end was so much louder than a
fortissimo at any other time in the work.
RICHARD STRAUSS GOLDEN RULES
It would be an excellent thing is someone in each band, possibly a flute
player or alto clarinettist, sewed a sampler for the conductor outlining
some of Richard Strauss’s Ten Golden Rules.
4 Never look encouragingly at the brass, except with a short glance to
give an important cue.
6 If you think that the brass is not blowing hard enough, tone it down
another shade or two.
There were instruments which I never heard over the BASBWE weekend
Conference in 2004. Harp and lower woodwind were especially inaudible.
Admittedly, much of the music in the repertoire exploited a bright,
brash, attacking sound-world, but it is essential that we take care of
the balance of what is in essence a huge chamber ensemble made up of
trios and quartets of instruments of widely differing colour and timbre.
MAX RUDOLF
puts it very clearly:
In most halls, the sound level of trumpets and trombones is just right
if the conductor barely hears them. The same is true for
horns in piano passages, while they often must be encouraged to bring
out a forte marcato. Woodwind soloists should hit the conductor’s ears
quite strongly to make sure that their sound carries into the
auditorium. This, of course, must not be accomplished by forcing the
tone, which would hurt the instrument’s sound quality and intonation.
The solution lies in having the accompanying
instruments play more softly….
ERICH LEINSDORF
in another of my bibles makes two excellent points about dynamic levels:
VERTICAL DYNAMICS
Composers often wrote one dynamic mark for the entire vertical scoring
involved. They expected performers to adjust their instruments' relative
strength according to the primary or secondary importance of their
roles.
A SUSTAINED NOTE IS ALWAYS STRONGER THAN A MOVING VOICE
There is one fundamental physical law that bears repetition, since so
many musicians are unaware of it; a sustained note is always stronger
than a moving voice....There is so much to be decided by the conductor
who cares for a balanced performance that no amount of detail can
possibly cover the permutations presented by such considerations as
types of instruments (and players), size and acoustic of hall, seating
arrangements, types of scoring....
PIERRE BOULEZ
explains the process of decision making:
There are times when respect for the musical text alone does not serve
much purpose. You may have a secondary part written for a relatively
weighty instrument, and a principal part written for a much lighter
instrument. You have to change the dynamics. I have no qualm about doing
that. As a fellow composer, I say to myself, "That's what he wanted to
hear, but he didn't have enough experience to write down the exact
dynamics,.” So I change them, that's all.
The composer has written a certain number of instrumental lines and on
the whole, he hasn't done so just to make a general amount of noise.
He's composed those lines so that we can hear certain things, so that we
can experience a certain hierarchy that's dependant on his writing. What
I try to do is to bring out that hierarchy in a very precise way, even
when its difficult.
You may be saying that all this is OK for playing Brahms or Bruckner,
but does not really work in the wind band repertoire.
WALTER BEELER,
one of the great band trainers of the last century said:
Restraint is especially important in fast music; the spirit begins to
suffer if played too loud. The audience tires, the players tire and it
becomes a very determined piece. It's hard for a band to play with
restraint because speed and excitement always tend to increase the
volume. But if we rely on articulations, accents and rhythm (rather than
volume) to bring about a condition of brightness, it will definitely be
more musical.
Von BULOW
Diminuendo
signifies forte, crescendo signifies piano.
GUNTHER SCHULLER
It is at that very highest level of performance that a wealth of
interpretative choices and decisions become available at least to the
really sensitive intelligent and imaginative recreator. It is in this
realm that there is not one pp, but many subtly different pps; not one f
but many different kinds of fs, and not one slur but many different
kinds of legatos etc. etc. The more basic point however is that it is pp
not a p or a mf.
PIERRE BOULEZ
For me an orchestra's lack of discipline is always reflected in a feeble
dynamic range....Something I do very often ....is to push the dynamic
register to the absolute maximum until it reaches what I think are
appropriate levels for a given work.
Two anecdotes from past BASBWE Conferences underline a concern I have
about our approach to musicmaking. A distinguished colleague in
discussion talked about how monotonous the sound world was with the
relentless loud music of the contemporary band. He needed strings, he
needed small ensemble work to break up the programme, he suggested
including transcriptions from earlier periods to change the pace.
Some time ago an equally distinguished colleague began a rehearsal of
one of his works by telling us that bands play too loud, and requesting
careful control of dynamics. The first time he stopped was to ask the
saxophones to play louder in a passage – NOT to ask the rest of the band
to play quieter.
THE IMPORTANCE OF KNOWING THE REPERTOIRE
I would respectfully take issue with both colleagues. To the former, I
would suggest that there is an incredibly rich vein of music available
to us through which we can change the pace and vary the sound-world. I
can remember hearing Duke Ellington on his last tour of UK, and the
variety of pace and dynamic was exemplary, the programme was as
carefully built as any by the Vienna Philharmonic or Chicago Symphony.
We in the band world are only limited by our knowledge of what is
available. Programme building is an Art, and following one loud
brilliant piece with another and another, each ushered along with
increasingly enormous gestures, is no way to build a programme.
Ignorance of the possibilities is one of our biggest problems. Select
carefully; as William Shakespeare advised - I count it but time lost
to hear such a foolish song.
ASK THE ACCOMPANIMENT TO BE LIGHTER
To the latter, I would suggest that we follow Max Rudolf’s advice, and
should almost invariably
ask the accompaniment to play quieter.
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY BANDS AGREE……..
I would go further, and propose that we consciously take down the
general level. The great Russian conducting teacher Ilya Musin used to
say that Forte is a characteristic. I have a couple of T-shirts
which proclaim that Forte is a Light Dynamic. If it is treated as
such, then fortissimo and molto fortissimo can take their place as truly
exciting points in the score, with one or two really roof-lifting
climaxes per concert, not a dozen in each piece.
…….FORTE IS STILL A LIGHT DYNAMIC!
|
||||||||||||||||